Talk:Evolution v. Creationism

From Campaigns Wikia

Given that this page is likely to spark some major debate, let me try to propose some ground rules:

• Please do not edit in the issue summary area where you disagree. (I think two of us already broke this rule to get the Creationism section moving, but I tried to be fair. Please feel free to make appropriate changes.)
• Any edits that are made in the summary sections should be supported by sources. If you have a conflicting source, please post it in the discussion section. Maybe we should allow a "link to rebuttal"?
• Obviously, try to keep the debate polite and civilized. --Jafree 22:08, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Suggested revision

I don't think that the title of the section "Unobservable, and without scientific evidence" is entirely accurate. As I understand it, there is strong scientific evidence for all three of the statements included. If anyone needs me to research this, please say so... but I propose that the section at least be renamed "Not Directly Observable"; a more extensive rewrite of the whole "Evolution" section may be in order, as the present overview sounds deliberately written to sound weak. --Woozalia 15:17, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Duplicate Article

We need to either merge "Evolution and Intelligent Design" with "Evolution v. Creationism" or vice versa. Ender.krum 21:33, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Good call. Please add the merge-to/merge-from templates as appropriate, and we'll give it a week, then make it happen. Or you can be bold! Chadlupkes 21:52, 15 August 2006 (UTC)

Merged: Evolution and Intelligent Design with Evolution v. Creationism under the new title Theories on Origins: Evolution and Creationism (Intelligent Design).